Reason is written by one individual, but the voice is that of many individuals of Malvern. My final opinion, but multiple people's ideas. Call it theft of intellectual property if you want, I call it giving a voice to valid ideas. Comments are not only welcome, but truly important. Disagreement is the way we decide what works.
Sunday, September 19, 2010
New voices, resoultions, and handicaps...
This is the problem. Take a look and really think about it.
There has always been an us versus them mentality in town. It's a common thing in many smaller towns. It is very easy to dismiss it as 'their' problem. Which of them are you?
I'm not sure how to even start this topic. I was born and raised here, but I easily understand the feeling of being on the outside. I think I have a unique perspective because of this. I'm not of the handful of family names that makes up the 'pillar' of this community. I'm not an outsider in the literal sense of the word. I've worked with, gone to school with, grown up with, and got along with the 'few' all of my life, but I've struggled with the same feeling of exclusion and 'decision already made' issues.
I've been on the inside looking out. It feels like you are open to all. It feels like you are listening. In the moment you think you're doing the right thing.
I've been on the outside looking in. Suggesting things that really make sense, but being passed over like you were a dog that was yapping nonsense. I've not been invited to the discussions that make you feel like you're being ruled over by a small group of privileged individuals with the right name or contacts.
This is a tricky thing. I'm going to use MABA as the example because they are the main organization as of right now. Most of these critiques and the general time line can be applied to other organizations and in other towns. So please try and keep defensive reactions to specific examples to a minimum. I know it's hard.
The Malvern Betterment Forum was started. This was started by a handful of people. It was open to all. Everyone had an equal voice. Some felt that this group should be a community group, some felt it should be business oriented, others felt different ways. A majority jumped from that group to take over MABA. I was one that largely cut my ties at this point.
MABA became a 'doer' of the community. But somehow it became the 'few' that ran the group. The 'few' took control and drove it the direction that they felt was best. (And they have accomplished a few great things) The 'few' took leadership positions. And somewhere along the line, largely all the 'outsiders' stepped away. Now it is the 'few' deciding what is best for all.
Now one of the best 'doers' was not one of the original 'few'. How does an outsider become leader of the 'few', and now led by another 'outsider'? The 'few' point to this and say "they aren't one of the 'few', see we accept all!" Is this a good point, or is this the exception, not the norm? I think we can tell which, but it does punch holes in the 'outsider' issue to some degree, but it isn't what usually happens. There will always be personal bias from both sides, that's just human nature.
The point is that many people don't feel welcome. Many people feel ignored, or at best tolerated, at these meetings. I've felt that way, and I was one of the original members of the forum. I don't attend any longer because of these very issues. I know many others that will agree.
MABA can throw up their arms and cry "We don't do that" or "That's their problem". You can deny the issue, but that doesn't make anything better. I'm identifying problems, your choice is what to do with it.
Now to be fair, I can tell you from years of experience that it is never solely one person's or group's problem. There are issues from both sides. I'm not taking the 'outsider' view alone. For example, MABA does put announcements in the paper about meetings. MABA doesn't literally exclude anyone. Some 'Outsiders' are extra sensitive to these problems. Some 'Outsiders' may not even show up because of past experiences. This is not a one sided issue, but we need to acknowledge both side's issues and why they exist.
This should be three different posts, but I'm trying to get it out in one. Thank you to the author of the blog posted above. Hopefully this will be another voice for all of us to listen to and gain some insight. The issues addressed in the post need to be addressed. These issues need to be resolved. I'm not sure how to do that. The only thing I know is that we need to acknowledge and get past them. Not ignore or pretend they're not there, not throw the blame one way.
I do know that it's time to move forward as a whole and check the egos and hurt feelings at the door. SOON! It's time to suck it up and take some critique. It's time to try again if you've been excluded, and it's time to admit that there is a difference between the 'few' and the 'outsiders'. There is an inner circle, and there are people on the outside looking in.
I suggest everyone goes to the City Wide Initiative meeting. We all need to be heard, and if you don't think you're being hear, yell louder. I'll be there. Heck, I may even give some drama and stand up and declare who I am? Not like most of you couldn't already guess. Especially after this post.
A wise voice and 'doer' that this town has lost, recently said to me that the belief that there is a handicap is the biggest handicap for this town. This town is what we make it. There will be issues. There will be hurt feelings. It's time to get over it and work together... or we will all be going down together sooner than later.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'm guessing the author is familiar with the Law of Diminishing Returns? I think the direction of this blog has gotten there...this post in particular. Happy to talk about it this weekend, though. I'll be around.
ReplyDeleteMaybe I should correct/explain that post....The direction of this blog has been fairly consistent. It was this particular post that tends to rub, I guess. It comes off much more.....personal. Anonymity can be useful, and even effective, but it's a slippery slope. It's also easier to pull off in a big city, or for a larger audience. Malvern is neither. While all of the discussions and posts have been well-reasoned and thought through with honesty, I fear that the tone of this particular post could be detrimental to the cause.
ReplyDeleteI learend the hard way that NOT being anonymous can have its consequences in certain situations. But I don't feel this is such an occasion. While I don't live in Malvern anymore, or pay local taxes, I still proudly claim it as my hometown. Perhaps my voice is lessened because of that. I feel that I do my part to contribute to its local economy whenever possible. As an admirer of my hometown, I absolutely love the passion that has been flowing from a large amount of people, especially in the wake of the most polarizing and painful event in the town's history. We shouldn't feel forced to hide behind anonymity to drive meaningful discourse, especially if it means community betterment, and, still, the healing.
Truth is, candor is not a bad thing. When it's done with respect and courtesy, speaking candidly (i.e. voicing disagreement) to a friend or colleague should not be taken maliciously, and it certainly shouldn't drive people away from action or volunteerism. This blog has been about speaking with candor.....only with anonymity out of fear of becoming isolated for such candor. That's unfortunate, both for the author, and the fellow readers. The topics have been thought-provoking, with lots of substance for people to dig into and discuss. But respect is a two-way street, and I fear that the initial point of this anonymous blog may result in the exact outcome that the author was trying to avoid. Hope not, though.
Very fair and well thought out comment Mr. Dixon.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree that this post was a bit more personal. I don't want to be taking cheap shots and I certainly don't want to be unfair.
I used the term 'few' in reference to the post I linked to. I'm not sure who the 'few' that are being referenced are for 100% in that post, and should not make assumptions that I do know who is being referenced.
The problem is that whoever the 'few' are in this case, another case, or in another town... it is a common occurrence in many places. For example, there is a non-Glenwood Homecoming party because a lot of people feel left out during that weekend. The 'few' of Glenwood are outnumbered by the 'outsiders', but somehow the majority are psychologically the minority.
I'm not personally holding any grudge against the 'few'. As I stated I've lived with them all of my life, as well as you have also. We had rather similar situations growing up.
The issue is that there is a public perception issue. MABA is run by great people. MABA is doing some great things. The thing is that I have heard numerous people complaining about their practices and how they make decisions. I don't agree with either faction all the time. What I'm trying to do is make people realize there is an undercurrent that can get ugly and undermine the progress.
The 'outsiders' need to be represented and listened to, but the 'outsider' is also hyper-sensitive in my experience. The claims don't always hold water, but there is merit to the outcry.
The 'few' need to realize that this is a concern. I've been in the room when decisions are made without any other voices being heard. It's been my voice that was ignored, and I've been one of the ignore(ers) too. It's easy to say that it's open and anyone could speak, but you have to listen also.
Thanks for your comment and I'll keep that in mind.